Statement of the preparatory session of the Conference on Rights and Freedoms and for a Just Democratic Republic

Statement of the preparatory session of the Conference on Rights and Freedoms and for a Just Democratic Republic

Today, Saturday, May 31, 2025, we conclude the preparatory session for the National Conference on Rights and Freedoms and for a Just Democratic Republic, with the participation of representatives of many associations, parties, youth activists and independent activists.

The initiative has gained positive resonance, as it has stirred up stagnant waters and provided many actors with a possible horizon for a more effective civil and political action that breaks with the state of disorientation and fragmentation and undertakes the task of defending rights, freedoms and democracy with the clarity, radicalism and aggregation that it requires.

The initiative came in the context of the authorities’ escalation of their totalitarian and repressive approach, as evidenced by the unjust verdicts in the “conspiracy” case, followed by the arrest and imprisonment of lawyer and former judge Ahmed Souab, joining the endless list of victims of the criminalization of political, civil, journalistic and trade union work. By relying on repressive police practices and using its control over the courts, which are subject to the arbitrary imposition of exemptions and work warrants, the monopoly of power and the change of power paved the way for the criminalization of political, civil, journalistic, and trade union work. The monopolization of power and the unilateral change of the system of government have gradually eradicated the gains of freedom that the people gained through their revolution and the blood of their martyrs, and returned to a climate of silence, fear, and intimidation, both within state institutions and against intermediary bodies, the media, those involved in public affairs, and all citizens, turning Tunisia into a large prison.

Experience has proven the lie that monopolizing power is effective in achieving economic and social results. The regime confronts the deep economic and social crisis under which Tunisians are living by selling illusions and propaganda, and by adopting a conspiracy theory as the only way to explain all the crises. By hiding behind a conspiracy narrative and inventing “internal enemies” to justify the absolute irresponsibility of the holder of absolute power, the regime ignores the structural factors in the crises of water scarcity, high prices, and the deterioration of public services as a result of austerity policies. It also hid behind a hateful racist narrative to cover up its role as a guardian of European borders in exchange for political recognition of the regime and paltry sums of money, leaving thousands of Tunisian migrants in Europe and sub-Saharan migrants in Tunisia and their supporters to pay the price for the state’s submission to the policies of the neo-fascist government in Italy.

The return of social protests, whether by sectors, organizations, or individuals, is a clear indication of the falsity of the regime’s propaganda and slogans, and of the growing social anger. As usual, the authorities respond to protests with repression and punishment, such as in Mazouna and Zarzis or against youth protesting for the right to a healthy environment in Gabes, and they use their arms to hack and abort any social movement, as in the case of women working in the agricultural sector. The social movements have exposed the authority’s inability to find realistic solutions and revealed that its investment in hatred and grievances and the marketing of superficial measures will not extinguish popular demands for a dignified life.

The escalation and expansion of repression is a sign of weakness and terror in the regime’s ranks. Its ability to systematically destroy the gains of the revolution cannot cover its lack of sustainability, its total dependence on the person of the president, and its inability to build a coherent structure and even to enforce the provisions of its own unilateral constitution.  While we reiterate that the autocratic system is irreparable, its isolation and refusal to engage in dialogue and recognize the crisis only increases its danger and fragility. On the other hand, there is a growing conviction within broad sectors of society that the collapse must end, the people must regain their democratic decision-making, and the gains of their revolution must be restored.

The common ground we share in defense of human rights in their universality and comprehensiveness, social justice, and adherence to the revolution of freedom and dignity and its gains requires us to take a principled and decisive stance that condemns political prosecutions, the process of liquidating political opponents, and arbitrary measures such as restricting the activities of parties and associations, closing headquarters, and preventing meetings. A position that does not differentiate between victims of tyranny and does not confuse political responsibility with criminal responsibility. A position that recognizes the right of all to political and civil action and believes in a democracy based on political rivalry between diverse senses and not on antagonism and cancellation. While we believe in the need to draw all lessons from the failure of the democratic experience to fulfill its promises, this does not in any way justify the acceptance of an authoritarian regime or the postponement of the demand to build a democratic republic. There is no way to separate the daily human rights and social struggles from the demand to resume the democratic process, overthrow the rule of the individual, and build a state of law and truth. It is politically meaningless to demand freedoms while accepting a political system based on the rule of the individual. The human rights and political task today is to think of a roadmap for a return to a democratic republic that courageously raises the question of constitutional legitimacy and the political system, and translates a principled position on the nature of the existing authoritarian system and the impossibility of reforming it

The experience of the post-July 25, 2021 activism has shown the urgent need for methods of struggle that unite ranks and overcome the existing stalemate, based on clear contents and alternatives. This requires the establishment of democratic working mechanisms based on discussion and debate, overcoming isolationism, and opening up to the various militant energies within society. Therefore, at the conclusion of this session, we declare the beginning of a new phase of activism, through a dynamic of collective thinking and mobilization capable of confronting tyranny, building bridges with tributaries of social resistance, and changing the balance of power in favor of the will for democratic change. Our only path is a peaceful and civil struggle, without separating between human rights and social demands and political change for a democratic system that guarantees human dignity and expresses pluralism within society.

Digital Report of the Tunisian Social Observatory – First Quarter 2025

0

Tunisian Social Observatory  

January – March 2025 Report    Rise of the protest movement Suicides by protest and violence in a context of persistent impunity    At the start of 2025, the protest movement resumed its activity and demands, ending the first quarter of the year with 1,132 protest actions. The first months of the year regained momentum, and the pace of protests doubled by 238% compared with the same period the previous year. In 2024, only 475 actions were recorded in the first three months of the year, making it the lowest year in terms of movements since 2011.  Demands linked to the regularization of the professional status of old, unresolved social files, such as construction workers, teachers and supply teachers, the right to employ unemployed graduates, improved working conditions and payment of benefits, were the main thrust of the movement in the first months of the year. These issues were at the heart of the movement’s concerns during the first months of the year, and accounted for a percentage of 53%.  Contrary to custom, the official discourse of the Presidency of the Republic, which on more than one occasion called for an end to precarious contracts, the resolution of outstanding professional situations and the achievement of the desired social justice, served as a catalyst for the launch of a wave of movements and sit-ins at the beginning of the year, the numbers of which surged and multiplied more than once, and the pace of which would not have been slowed or curbed had it not been for the arrival of Ramadan during the month of March.  March saw the lowest number of actions since the start of the year, with 217, compared to February, which recorded 432 actions, and January, during which 483 protest actions were observed.  In the first quarter of 2025, social actors are adopting digital space less and less as a framework for demands in favor of public space, including workplaces, roads, public places, squares, judicial institutions and prisons.  The Tunisian Social Observatory continues to monitor the evolution of Tunisians’ dissatisfaction, due to rising prices, falling living standards and the difficulty of meeting life’s needs. In addition to protesting against the inadequacy of infrastructure, the deterioration of public administrative services, the weakness of the transport fleet, the continuous interruption of drinking water and the fluctuating supply, which has become a permanent and daily dilemma for the population in towns and rural areas in all the Republic’s governorates without exception.  The first three months of the year saw a further decline in freedom of expression and of the press, with threats and violations multiplying, and the level of harassment of journalists and users of social media networks increasing. The organization of the first session of the trial of the defendants in the so-called conspiracy case, on March 4, 2025, was marked by a fierce return of smear campaigns and cyber-harassment that targeted all voices defending the defendants’ right to a face-to-face, not remote, trial in which all the fundamentals of a fair trial are respected.  The team follows the official party’s attachment to the rhetoric of betrayal and division, and the adoption of a binary narrative between patriots, unpatriots and conspirators against the security and stability of the state. Simultaneously, the situation of sub-Saharan migrants is worsening in a context of increasing violence and discrimination against them, and uncertainty about their fate after they found themselves trapped in olive groves in the delegations of El Amra and Jebeniana in the governorate of Sfax… unable to leave or realize the dream of reaching the northern shore of the Mediterranean.  At the same time, we note the continuation of movements in support of the Palestinian resistance throughout the first months of the year, denouncing the persistence of the genocide perpetrated by the Zionist entity against the Palestinian people in Gaza and the West Bank, multiplying actions of support on the part of Tunisians, and each time taking more diverse and richer cultural and economic forms (boycotts).  Employees, workers and the unemployed topped the list of actors who organized actions in the first quarter of the year, where they represented the main actor in around half of the actions recorded, followed by activists, rights defenders and trade unionists, students, prisoners and journalists. Next come activists, rights defenders, trade unionists, students, prisoners and journalists, who account for a quarter of the movements that have taken place in squares and boulevards since the beginning of the year. The same period also saw movements by residents, farmers, shopkeepers, individual and public bus drivers, students, parents, health workers, medical staff, sports teams and players.  The Tunisian capital, which bears witness to the centralization of decision-making, continues to occupy first place in the first quarter of the year, with 293 industrial actions. Next came Tataouine with 75 actions, Gafsa with 74 actions, Kairouan with 61 actions, Jendouba with 54 actions, Nabeul with 53 actions, Medenine with 51 actions, Tozeur and Sidi Bouzid with 50 actions, Kasserine with 48 actions, Bizerte with 40 actions, Sousse and Manouba with 36 actions… The protest zone extended to all the Republic’s governorates without exception, with Zaghouan recording the lowest number with 12 actions in the first three months of the year.  More than 88% of the actions observed took place on the ground, mainly involving vigils, sit-ins, labor strikes, business interruptions, hunger strikes, road blockades, red badge wearing, days of rage and workplace closures. The rest took digital form, in the form of appeals, petitions and statements of condemnation via the media and social networking sites. The movements recorded in the first three months of the year were not broken down by gender, as 984 of them were organized collectively, while men formed 107 movements and women 41 movements.  In over 80% of actions, social actors targeted official authorities, including the presidency of the Republic, the presidency of the government, regional authorities, ministries, municipalities and governors, while the remainder mainly targeted judicial authorities and the employer.  Based on the sample studied, in the first three months of the year, 33 suicide cases and attempts were tracked, many of them in the form of theatrical protests in the public space or in front of security service headquarters or inside judicial spaces or educational institutions. They chose to communicate their distress and the extent of the despair they felt, which led them to refuse to go on and to end their lives by hanging, setting fire to, consuming toxic substances or taking drugs.   The suicides monitored by the Tunisian Social Observatory team include 14 youth suicides, 10 child suicides, 8 adult suicides and one elderly suicide. Men accounted for 25 of the suicides, while women represented 8 cases.  The first quarter of the year was also characterized by widespread violence in a general context of impunity in cases of feminicide, the spread of cyber-violence, discriminatory discourse, racism and defamation… and a corresponding downplaying of the effects of this violence by official bodies, the media and citizens alike.   The first three months of the year saw a drop in the volume of interpersonal violence, while the public space occupied first place among the places and settings in which violence is exercised. These include the street, educational establishments such as schools and institutes, administrative and health facilities, and economic production institutions.  Violence is gradually evolving towards gender-specific forms, with a growing proportion of male aggressors accounting for 84% of recorded cases, while the number of victims of violence is closely divided between men, who make up 47% of victims, and women, who account for 40%. Assault and intimidation are the main targets of recorded cases of violence, followed by theft and sexual assault.  As for the types of violence recorded during the first quarter of the year, they mainly took the form of criminal offences, with murder or death threats accounting for the largest number of incidents observed, followed by theft and burglary. Other acts of violence, such as assaults on employees, kidnapping, rape, violence against children and women, domestic violence, sexual harassment, death threats and violence against men, were also documented.   

Tunisia’s designation as a safe third country of origin: The European Commission rewards Tunisian authorities for their cooperation on migration and whitewashes their abuses

Tunisia’s designation as a safe third country of origin: The European Commission rewards Tunisian authorities for their cooperation on migration and whitewashes their abuses The European Commission has issued a consolidated list of “safe third countries of origin,” which will be ratified by the Council and the European Parliament, making it binding on all EU countries. The creation of the “safe countries of origin” list is part of the policies of externalizing European migration policies, limiting asylum, facilitating and accelerating deportation and expulsion procedures, and becoming a political bargaining chip to whitewash undemocratic regimes to reward them for their cooperation in exporting European borders. Categorizing a country of origin as safe means that there is no risk of persecution and no respect for the rule of law and deprives citizens of that country of their right to a fair and effective asylum procedure, assuming they are not in need of international protection. This places them under expedited procedures that often end in the rejection of asylum claims, further legitimizing deportations and expulsions. Tunisia has been categorized as a safe country of origin. This designation contributes to the denial of systematic human rights violations in Tunisia and undermines the foundations of democracy as the President of the Republic has seized all powers. Civil society activists, social movements, journalists, trade unionists and politicians are being prosecuted as part of a systematic policy to silence any voice critical of the economic, political and social situation. The state of emergency continues, giving wide powers to limit rights and freedoms. The Tunisian Forum for Economic and Social Rights condemns European policies that are complicit with the systematic repression of the democratic and social movement and migrants in Tunisia and considers the classification of Tunisia as a safe country of origin as part of an undeclared political deal linked to the memorandum of understanding signed in July 2023 aimed at whitewashing the authoritarian deviation in Tunisia and giving more legitimacy to the processes of deporting and expelling irregular migrants to Tunisia and as a prelude to turning Tunisia into a safe third country that accepts the deportation of all migrants to it. Tunisian Forum for Economic and Social Rights President Abderrahmane Hedhili

(Français) Ahmed Souab

Sorry, this entry is only available in العربية.